Heroic Defenders Disrupt Separatist Offensive

Svetalana Golikova

By Svetlana Golikova, National Security Correspondent

ZELENOGORSK — In a series of lightning counter-offensives, the Chernarus 10th Separate Tank Brigade has dealt a severe blow to separatist ambitions in North Zagoria, though command failures prevented total victory, according to confidential military assessments obtained by Zelenogorsk Pravda.

Between 19–22 June, battalions of the 10th Brigade launched pre-emptive strikes against separatist strongholds in the villages of Oktyabrsky, Bogdanova, and Volnovakha. Intelligence indicated separatist forces, significantly reinforced by foreign fighters and heavy weaponry, planned to consolidate control over these strategic points to launch a coordinated offensive.

Triumph Amid Sacrifice

The 3rd Battalion’s assault on Oktyabrsky on 19 June succeeded in liberating the village from entrenched separatists, who included foreign combat specialists. The operation, however, came at a steep cost, with our forces sustaining heavy casualties during fierce counterattacks. Despite this, three local informants held captive by separatists were rescued, yielding critical intelligence on enemy plans.

The 4th Battalion’s strike on Bogdanova (20–21 June) proved a model of efficiency. In a rapid, violent assault, our troops shattered separatist defenses with minimal losses while inflicting catastrophic damage on enemy armor. Preliminary reports indicate dozens of separatist armored vehicles (BMPs, BTRs, and tanks) were destroyed.

Command Failure at Volnovakha

The 2nd Battalion’s operation on 22 June began with promise, as troops secured sectors of Volnovakha and established a foothold on the village’s northern edge. However, senior battalion commanders issued a premature withdrawal order, abandoning reinforcing units during intense enemy counterattacks. This decision left our troops exposed to concentrated tank and infantry fire, forcing a retreat. Volnovakha remains in separatist hands—a failure squarely attributed by the report to "poor command judgment."

Foreign Threat Confirmed

The assessment confirms separatist forces are now bolstered by foreign personnel—including North Korean regulars, Wagner Group mercenaries, and Spanish combatants—granting them enhanced aggression and tactical coordination. Their losses at Bogdanova and Okyabrsky have disrupted their offensive, but they remain a potent threat.

Accountability and Next Steps

The leaked report demands an "immediate investigation" into the 2nd Battalion’s command decisions and calls for reinforced resources to retake Volnovakha. It praises the "exemplary execution" at Bogdanova and the "critical intelligence" gained from local informants, urging expanded support for these networks.

Senior military officials, speaking anonymously, confirmed follow-on operations are already being planned. "Volnovakha will be liberated," one stressed. "Those responsible for failures will answer, and our defenders will finish the job."

— Svetlana Golikova has covered security operations in North Zagoria for 12 years.

This is based on the Arma 3 wargame. The report and reporter are AI generated and represents no individual, living or dead. The text of the transcript, while AI generated, is based on data provided by the channel author.

Operational After Action Report: Combat Operations in North Zagoria

OPERATIONAL AFTER ACTION REPORT: COMBAT OPERATIONS IN NORTH ZAGORIA

REPORTING UNIT: 43rd Mountain Rifle Corps, Intelligence Staff

AUTHOR: Colonel Sergei Glukharev, Deputy Head of Intelligence Staff

DATE: 23 June 2025

REPORT PERIOD: 19 June - 22 June 2025 (Inclusive)

SUBJECT: Combat Operations Conducted by Chernarus 10th Separate Tank Brigade (3rd, 4th, 2nd Battalions)

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Elements of the 10th Separate Tank Brigade (3rd, 4th, and 2nd Battalions) conducted offensive operations between 19-22 June 2025 to disrupt and defeat separatist attacks aimed at capturing the village line Oktyabrsky-Volnovakha-Bogdanova. Operations resulted in the successful recapture and temporary holding of Oktyabrsky (3rd Bn) and Bogdanova (4th Bn) against determined enemy counterattacks. The operation against Volnovakha (2nd Bn) failed to secure the objective due to premature withdrawal orders from Battalion command, leading to the village remaining under separatist control and necessitating follow-on operations. Enemy forces, significantly reinforced with foreign personnel and equipment, displayed increased aggression and capability.

2. BACKGROUND / SITUATION:

Enemy Intent: Intelligence derived from SIGINT (email, text intercepts) and HUMINT (local friendly agents) confirmed separatist plans to launch coordinated attacks to seize and hold the villages of Oktyabrsky), Volnovakha, and Bogdanova. This offensive initiative was assessed as enabled by recent infusions of fresh troops, supplies (including heavy armor), and new leadership.

Friendly Intent: 10th Tank Brigade tasked subordinate battalions with conducting pre-emptive counter-offensives to recapture these villages before separatist attacks could consolidate, disrupt enemy plans, inflict maximum casualties, and liberate the objectives. Operations were to be executed sequentially as forces became available.

3. NARRATIVE OF OPERATIONS:

text

*   **a. Operation: OKTYABRSKY RECAPTURE (3rd Battalion - 19 June)**

    *   **Tactical Situation:** Separatist forces, including embedded North Korean regulars, Wagner Group operators, and Spanish regulars, occupied defensive positions within and around Oktyabrsky.

    *   **Friendly Actions:** 3rd Battalion assault squad launched a swift attack to seize the village. Initial penetration was achieved.

    *   **Enemy Actions:** Enemy forces mounted fierce, coordinated flanking counterattacks utilizing infantry and likely supporting fires. Resistance was significantly heavier than anticipated due to the presence of embedded foreign specialists.

    *   **Result:** The village was successfully recaptured. However, the assault squad sustained **heavy casualties** during the initial assault and subsequent counterattacks. Reinforcements were committed to consolidate the position. Three (3) local friendly agents, held captive by separatists, were successfully recovered during the operation and evacuated for debriefing. HUMINT gathered during/after the operation strongly indicated imminent separatist attacks targeting Bogdanova and Volnovakha. The initial 3rd Bn task force withdrew once reinforcing troops were in position. These reinforcing troops executed a planned withdrawal under cover of darkness approximately 12 hours later, having confirmed the disruption of the enemy's immediate plan against Oktyabrsky.

*   **b. Operation: BOGDANOVA STRIKE (4th Battalion - 20/21 June)**

    *   **Tactical Situation:** Separatist infantry had established a defensive cordon within Bogdanova in preparation for their planned offensive.

    *   **Friendly Actions:** 4th Battalion task force conducted a rapid and violent assault, penetrating the enemy's defensive perimeter.

    *   **Enemy Actions:** Separatist forces defended their positions but were overwhelmed by the speed and violence of the friendly assault. Enemy medium and heavy tracked armor units were committed in counterattack or were caught in position.

    *   **Result:** Bogdanova was successfully secured. Friendly infantry casualties were reported as **minimal**. While the initial Task Force Commander's summary lacked detail on enemy losses, subsequent debriefs of participating NCOs confirmed the destruction of a **prodigious number** of enemy medium and heavy armored vehicles (BMPs, BTRs, Tanks). The 4th Bn task force withdrew in good order once reinforcing troops were established in the village. The reinforcing troops later withdrew per operational plan.

*   **c. Operation: VOLNOVAKHA SECURE (2nd Battalion - 22 June)**

    *   **Tactical Situation:** Separatist forces occupied Volnovakha, consolidating for their offensive operation.

    *   **Friendly Actions:** Initial elements of the 2nd Battalion task force rapidly entered and secured sectors of Volnovakha. Reinforcing friendly infantry and armor units seized and established a hold on the northern edge of the village.

    *   **Enemy Actions:** Enemy forces regrouped and launched strong combined arms counterattacks utilizing infantry and armor.

    *   **Friendly Command Decision:** 2nd Battalion Command Staff issued an order for the *entire task force*, including the reinforcing elements holding the northern edge, to withdraw back to base *prematurely*.

    *   **Result:** The premature withdrawal order left the reinforcing troops on the northern edge exposed and unsupported during their disengagement. These elements became **highly vulnerable** to concentrated enemy tank and infantry attacks during their retreat. Unable to maintain their foothold under pressure, friendly forces were driven back south. **Volnovakha remains under separatist control.**

4. ANALYSIS / ASSESSMENT:

Enemy: Demonstrated significantly enhanced combat power, coordination, and aggression due to foreign reinforcements (NK, Wagner, Spanish) and new leadership. Capable of launching determined, well-supported counterattacks. Their operational plan (seizing the 3 villages) was effectively disrupted at Oktyabrsky and Bogdanova. Losses in armor, particularly at Bogdanova, were severe.

Friendly:

3rd Battalion: Achieved the objective at Oktyabrsky but at high cost, highlighting vulnerability to complex enemy counterattacks and the effectiveness of embedded foreign specialists. Successful recovery of agents provided critical intelligence.

4th Battalion: Exemplary execution at Bogdanova. Achieved rapid penetration, minimized friendly losses, and inflicted devastating damage on enemy armor. A model operation under the circumstances.

2nd Battalion: Initial tactical success in securing parts of Volnovakha was squandered by poor command judgment at the Battalion level. The premature withdrawal order disregarded the tactical situation of committed reinforcing troops, leading directly to their vulnerability, failure to hold ground, and the loss of the objective. Command Staff decision-making requires urgent review.

Intelligence: SIGINT and HUMINT provided accurate warning of enemy intentions and objectives, enabling pre-emptive operations. Agent recovery in Oktyabrsky yielded timely confirmation of secondary targets. Effectiveness of enemy foreign reinforcements was confirmed in combat.

Volnovakha Failure: The primary cause was the ill-timed withdrawal order from 2nd Battalion Command Staff. This decision ceded the initiative, abandoned a tenable foothold, and exposed withdrawing troops unnecessarily. The responsibility for this failure rests clearly at the Battalion command level.

5. CONCLUSIONS:

The 10th Tank Brigade successfully disrupted the separatist offensive plan at Okyabrsky and Bogdanova, inflicting significant losses, particularly in armor at Bogdanova.

The operation at Volnovakha was a failure directly attributable to faulty command decisions by 2nd Battalion Command Staff.

Enemy forces, bolstered by foreign personnel and supplies, remain a potent threat capable of complex counterattacks.

The recovery and intelligence from local agents proved highly valuable.

The failure at Volnovakha necessitates an immediate follow-up operation by 2nd Battalion to seize the objective that should have been secured on 22 June.

6. RECOMMENDATIONS:

2nd Battalion Command Review: Immediate investigation and review of the command decision-making process within 2nd Battalion Command Staff that led to the premature withdrawal order from Volnovakha. Consideration of remedial training or personnel changes as warranted.

Reinforce 2nd Battalion: Ensure 2nd Battalion receives adequate resources (potentially including Corps-level assets) and a robust plan for the imminent operation to recapture Volnovakha. Emphasis on maintaining the objective once seized.

Foreign Adversary Tactics: Disseminate detailed lessons learned regarding tactics employed by embedded North Korean, Wagner, and Spanish elements encountered at Okyabrsky to all Brigade and Corps units. Adapt training accordingly.

HUMINT Network Sustainment: Continue efforts to support and expand the local friendly agent network in North Zagoria. Their contribution was operationally significant.

Continued Vigilance: 10th Tank Brigade and Corps Intelligence must maintain high alert for indications of further enemy reinforcement or shifts in strategy following these setbacks.

7. NEXT STEPS: 10th Separate Tank Brigade will continue offensive operations in North Zagoria during the coming week, with the recapture of Volnovakha by 2nd Battalion being an immediate priority. Corps Intelligence will continue monitoring enemy communications and agent reports for shifts in force disposition or intent.

ATTACHMENTS: None referenced in this summary. (Note: Full Tactical Summaries from Battalion Commanders, Agent Debrief Summaries, SIGINT reports, and detailed CASREP/Loss reports would typically be appended or available separately).

// SIGNED //

COLONEL SERGEI GLUKHAREV

Deputy Head of Intelligence Staff

43rd Mountain Rifle Corps

This is based on the Arma 3 wargame. The report and reporter are AI generated and represents no individual, living or dead. The text of the transcript, while AI generated, is based on data provided by the channel author.

MILITARY INTELLIGENCE APPRECIATION, June 10th, 2025

 

MILITARY INTELLIGENCE APPRECIATION

SUBJECT: Separatist Offensive Preparations in Ivanovka Region
UNIT: Chernarus 43rd Mountain Rifle Corps (MRC)
AUTHOR: Colonel Sergei Glukharev, Deputy Head of Intelligence Staff
DATE: 10 JUNE 2025
REFERENCE: Corps Intelligence Summaries, SIGINT/IMINT Reports, HUMINT Sources

1. SITUATION:
Staff analysts assess with HIGH CONFIDENCE that separatist forces are in the final stages of preparing a major offensive operation aimed at capturing key settlements within the Ivanovka Region. This assessment is based on convergent reporting from Signals Intelligence (SIGINT), Imagery Intelligence (IMINT) via drone and combat aircraft overflights, and Human Intelligence (HUMINT) from local agents and constabulary actions.

2. ENEMY FORCES (SEPARATIST & AUXILIARIES):

• a. Composition & Strength:

  • Core Combat Elements: Battalion-sized combined arms groups forming. Elements include:

    • Armor: Multiple companies of medium (T-72 variants) and heavy tanks (T-62/T-55), supported by tracked IFVs/APCs (BMP-2/BMP-3, MT-LB).

    • Mechanized Infantry: Significant numbers of motorized infantry, including dismounted elements.

    • Artillery/Mortars: Identified mortar batteries (82mm) and potential for tube/rocket artillery not yet observed in assembly areas.

    • Air Defense: Multiple batteries of mobile anti-aircraft artillery (ZU-23-2, possibly S-60 on trucks, MANPADS probable).

    • Combat Support: Observed combat engineers, signals units, and significant logistical tail.

  • Foreign Personnel: HUMINT and limited IMINT confirm embedded foreign elements providing cadre and combat power:

    • Russian SOF (Spetsnaz GRU/Wagner veterans - tactical leadership, spec ops).

    • Wagner Group Operators (experienced infantry/assault elements).

    • North Korean Regulars (discipline, likely infantry/AA roles).

    • Serbian Volunteers (infantry/possible artillery).

    • Spanish Volunteers (infantry role).

  • Local Militias: Active recruitment/training of local shooters observed; likely used for screening, sabotage, and holding captured terrain.

• b. Disposition & Movement:

  • Concentration Areas: Northern Ivanovka Region, specifically wooded areas and concealed valleys near road networks leading to objectives.

  • Timing: Exploiting prolonged mild, dry weather for rapid movement. Major equipment and troop movements primarily nocturnal (2200-0400 hrs local).

  • Logistics: Extensive logistics network established. Confirmed:

    • Multiple Forward Munitions Depots (FMDs).

    • Forward Arming and Refueling Points (FARPs).

    • High volume of supply trucks (ammunition, fuel, spares) - numbers exceeding reliable HUMINT count estimates. Indicates preparation for sustained combat.

• c. Capabilities & Limitations:

  • Strengths: Significant armored punch; substantial, well-equipped, and disciplined infantry core augmented by experienced foreign elements; robust short-range AD coverage threatening our air assets; effective camouflage and deception during movement; demonstrated night operations capability; substantial logistical stockpiling.

  • Weaknesses: Potential coordination friction between diverse foreign units and local militias; logistical tail vulnerable to interdiction; concentration areas becoming known; limited long-range AD or counter-battery radar observed so far; armor vulnerable in approach routes if identified early.

3. ENEMY INTENTIONS & OBJECTIVES:

• Primary Objective: Seize control of the Ivanovka Region through a coordinated multi-axis offensive.

• Specific Named Objectives: Villages identified as primary targets:

  • Serebryanna

  • Vychesgrad

  • Belgorvka

  • Troitskoye

  • Malenovka

  • Rebovo
    (Additional villages likely on subsidiary axes)

• Method: Likely combined arms assault utilizing armor spearheads to breach defenses, followed by mechanized infantry to clear and hold, supported by mortars and direct fire. Expect supporting attacks/feints on flanks. Offensive likely imminent (within 72-96 hours).

4. ENEMY COVERT & SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES (CONFIRMING INTENT):
HUMINT reports a significant uptick in destabilizing actions within government-held towns proximal to Ivanovka:

• Assassinations of local officials and pro-government leaders.

• Kidnappings for ransom/extortion/intimidation.

• "Strong-arm" robberies targeting residents (funding/logistics).

• Covert recruitment and training of local militia ("new shooters").

• Agent Detention: Local constabularies have detained numerous separatist agents masquerading as civilians. Captured material includes:

  • Large quantities of cash (funding operations).

  • Personal weapons (pistols, SMGs, grenades).

  • Critical Intelligence: Documents and maps corroborating drone/aircraft sightings of troop concentrations, logistics points, and specific offensive timetables/targets (aligning with villages listed above). This provides irrefutable confirmation of offensive planning.

5. FRIENDLY SITUATION:

• 43rd MRC holds defensive positions in and around the Ivanovka Region.

• Constabulary forces are active but overstretched dealing with internal subversion.

• Air assets (drones, limited combat aircraft) are providing vital reconnaissance but face increased threat from enemy ADA buildup.

• Local population in target villages is vulnerable; loyalty may be coerced if separatists gain foothold.

6. ASSESSMENT:

• a. Enemy Capability: The separatists have assembled a VERY HIGH level of combat power in the Ivanovka Region, combining potent armored forces, substantial and capable infantry (including experienced foreign elements), effective tactical air defense, and extensive logistics. Their night movement discipline indicates professional planning.

• b. Enemy Intent: The convergence of IMINT (equipment/logistics concentrations), SIGINT (intercepted comms), HUMINT (agent reports on morale/targets), and crucially, captured enemy documents leaves NO REASONABLE DOUBT that a major offensive targeting the specified villages (Serebryanna, Vychesgrad, Belgorvka, Troitskoye, Malenovka, Rebovo) is in its final preparatory stages and is imminent.

• c. Imminence: Based on logistical emplacement completion, concentration of forces, and indicators from captured documents, the offensive is assessed as likely to commence within the next 72-96 HOURS, potentially sooner. Expect preparatory recon/sabotage to increase sharply.

7. RECOMMENDATIONS:

1. Immediate Alert: Place all 43rd MRC units in the Ivanovka AO at HIGHEST COMBAT READINESS (READINESS STATE 1).

2. Enhanced Reconnaissance:

   • Maximize drone surveillance (day/night) on identified concentration areas, approach routes, and logistics nodes.

   • Conduct targeted artillery reconnaissance (adjustment fires) on suspected assembly areas if feasible without compromising positions.

   • Task SOF/Recon elements for close-target reconnaissance on critical choke points and armor positions.

3. Preemptive Fires: Initiate planned counter-preparation artillery and MLRS strikes on confirmed and suspected enemy assembly areas, FARPs, FMDs, and ADA positions AT THE EARLIEST OPPORTUNITY, leveraging precise targeting data.

4. Air Operations:

   • Plan and execute preemptive airstrikes on high-value armor concentrations and logistics hubs, prioritizing night strikes.

   • STRESS: Air operations must assume heavy, low-altitude ADA threat. SEAD/DEAD support is critical but likely limited; extreme caution required.

5. Force Protection: Harden forward positions against anticipated armor/infantry assaults. Emplace additional ATGM teams, mines (if available), and prepare fallback positions. Enforce strict light/noise discipline.

6. Counter-Subversion: Direct constabularies to intensify counter-intelligence operations and security sweeps in rear areas. Protect key leaders and infrastructure. Exploit captured agents for further intelligence.

7. Logistics: Ensure forward units have maximum basic loads (ammo, AT, water, med). Pre-position additional stocks where possible.

8. Civil Affairs: Prepare contingency plans for civilian evacuation from targeted villages if feasible, without compromising defense. Issue warnings to populace via secure channels.

CONCLUSION:
The separatist force in Northern Ivanovka represents the most significant and well-prepared offensive threat faced by the 43rd MRC in recent months. Their capabilities are substantial, their intentions are clear and confirmed by multiple intelligence disciplines, including captured enemy plans, and their attack is imminent. Failure to act decisively and preemptively risks the loss of critical territory, significant friendly casualties, and a major strategic setback. Immediate and aggressive counter-preparation is essential to disrupt the enemy's timetable, degrade their combat power, and defend the Ivanovka Region.

// SIGNED //
Colonel Sergei Glukharev
Deputy Head of Intelligence Staff
Chernarus 43rd Mountain Rifle Corps
10 JUNE 2025

DISTRIBUTION:
Corps Commander, Chief of Staff, Operations Staff (G3), Logistics Staff (G4), Artillery Commander, Air Liaison Officer, All Brigade/Regimental Commanders (Ivanovka AO), National Intelligence Directorate (Copy).

This is based on the Arma 3 wargame. The report and reporter are AI generated and represents no individual, living or dead. The text of the transcript, while AI generated, is based on data provided by the channel author.

Counterintelligence Sweep Nets Three in Berezino; Peace Group Office Used for Alleged Separatist Comms

 

By Svetlana Golikova

Zelenogorsk Pravda
Dateline: Zelenogorsk, June 11, 2025

Svetlana Golikova

ZELENOGORSK – A joint counterintelligence raid in Berezino on Wednesday resulted in the arrest of three individuals accused of using burner phones to transmit sensitive military information to separatist commanders, officials announced. The operation, conducted by the Ministry of Justice, Chernarus Defense Forces (CDF) counterintelligence, and local police, targeted the local office of the "Trees for Peace" advocacy group, where two of the detainees held leadership positions.

Detained were Igor Zubov (b. 1985), Alexey Svetlichny (b. 1987), and Nadezhda Ulyanova (b. 2007). Alongside multiple burner phones, authorities seized documents allegedly detailing communications with separatist forces. The trio was swiftly transported by helicopter to Novigrad, where a court remanded them into pre-trial detention for 150 days while investigations proceed.

"It is ironic that these three used the offices of a peace group to aid a hostile enemy of Chernarus by providing critical information about army and navy troop movements," stated Chernarus Minister of Justice Irina Veshnyakova. "Their perfidy harmed our troops."

Military Operations Preceded Arrests
The arrests follow intense CDF operations in western South Zagoria. According to notes provided by an anonymous source within the Chernarus Coastal Operations Group, a critical breakthrough occurred just a day prior during Operation OP2506-06-5 near Kabanino.

A task force from the 2nd Battalion, 4th Separate Light Mountain Rifle Brigade, attacked a significant separatist buildup southwest of Kabanino. Intelligence indicated this force, including Wagner Group operators, Russian militia, and local fighters, along with a mortar battery, signaled a planned shift of separatist offensive operations to western South Zagoria. During the operation, the task force commander reportedly seized a list of separatist informants, including cell phone numbers, from a civilian criminal command operative described as a "female minder."

The task force repelled counterattacks involving Russian militia, Serbian regulars, Russian special forces, technicals (improvised fighting vehicles), and UAVs using artillery support. Withdrawing under pursuit, including by a T-34 tank, the force was relieved by reinforcements blocking further separatist advances at Rogovo. Seized documents also hinted at a planned separatist operation near Myshkino.

Acting on this intelligence, the same battalion launched Operation OP2506-06-6 near Bogytyrka the following morning. The source described this action as swift and successful, eliminating two technicals and forcing separatist withdrawal. The task force commander located and "eliminated" two more civilian criminal command operatives, seizing further documents and a cell phone from another "female minder." One document detailed planned locations for vehicle repair and armament depots further north. The task force withdrew to Myshkino after inflicting what the source termed "nearly catastrophic" separatist casualties.

Peace Group Expresses Shock, Defends Young Staffer
"Trees for Peace" spokesman Ruslan Belvidorov expressed profound shock at the arrests occurring within their Berezino office. Speaking to this reporter, he vehemently denied any organizational knowledge of alleged separatist ties.

"Our organization seeks peace, not to give one side an advantage over the other. The three people arrested Wednesday were unknown to us as separatist operatives, obviously," Belvidorov stated. "Had we known about their background or how they were able to deceive us, we would never have accepted them in our ranks."

Belvidorov reserved his strongest defense for Nadezhda Ulyanova, the youngest detainee. "She was fresh out of high school, working at the office for the summer. I can't believe she had anything to do with this," he insisted. "The Ministry of Justice agents did not find a burner phone on her, or any phone, for that matter. She came from a poor farming family up north, and her family could not afford a cell phone." Belvidorov predicted Ulyanova would be released once investigators confirmed her lack of involvement, describing her as "just a sweet girl" aspiring to attend university in the fall.

He also contested the arrest methods: "The plainclothes CDF counterintelligence agents were very rough on the three detainees, unnecessarily so." Belvidorov added that agents confiscated office files, member lists, and the organization's checkbook, which he hopes will be returned.

Regarding Zubov and Svetlichny, Belvidorov noted observations that now appear suspicious in hindsight. Zubov "always had two phones with him," claiming his wife insisted on it – something Belvidorov found "strange." Zubov only provided one number to the organization, and Belvidorov rarely saw him use the second phone. He also dismissed speculation about any relationship between Zubov and Ulyanova, citing the 22-year age gap and Ulyanova's strict upbringing.

Svetlichny was described as "a drunk, constantly show[ing] up at the office drunk." He also possessed two phones, "one he used constantly and the other not very often." Belvidorov admitted the office staff didn't find this unusual at the time but acknowledged, "I guess we should have." He noted the Berezino office manager had repeatedly complained about Svetlichny's drinking and sought his dismissal.

The arrests highlight the persistent threat of espionage within Chernarus and the ongoing, deadly counteroffensive against separatist forces in South Zagoria. The investigation into the three detainees continues, with the fate of the young Ulyanova drawing particular public attention and the "Trees for Peace" organization grappling with a severe breach of trust.

This is based on the Arma 3 wargame. The report and reporter are AI generated and represents no individual, living or dead. The text of the transcript, while AI generated, is based on data provided by the channel author.

INTENSE FIGHTING NEAR SHAKHOVKA: Chernarus Troops Repel Separatists at High Cost, Uncover War Crimes

 

Svetlana Golikova

By Svetlana Golikova

National Defense Reporter

ZELENOGORSK – Chernarus Armed Forces have concluded weeks of brutal fighting near the villages of Shakhovka and Staroye, securing vital territory but sustaining significant casualties, military sources confirm. The operations, conducted by elite light mountain and mechanized cavalry units, exposed deepening foreign involvement in the separatist insurgency and uncovered evidence of systematic civilian targeting by enemy forces.

Mountain Troops Swiftly Liberate Shakhovka

In a lightning operation on May 30, the 1st Battalion, 4th Separate Light Mountain Rifle Brigade, assaulted separatist positions in Shakhovka. Intelligence indicated the village was held by irregulars reinforced with foreign mercenaries – including Wagner Group operators – who had prepared "elimination lists" targeting 32 local civilians.

The attack, codenamed OP2505-30-5, succeeded through swift, coordinated maneuvers avoiding pre-sighted enemy artillery. Mountain troops eliminated mercenary high-value targets (HVTs) and captured critical intelligence: digital server access points and physical documents detailing the planned civilian purge. No non-combatant casualties were reported during the liberation.

Merciless Counterattack at Coastal Factory

The following day, June 1, the same mountain battalion faced a major separatist counterattack at a strategic coastal factory complex ("The Factory"). Despite repelling the assault by a mechanized infantry force "larger than a company," friendly forces suffered heavy losses. The factory’s defense denied separatists access to the critical NS-7 Coastal Highway and the port of Berezino.

Cavalry Regiment’s Bitter Struggle

Simultaneously, the 1st Battalion, 19th Separate Mechanized Cavalry Regiment, launched an attack (OP2505-30-7) on May 30 targeting Staroye and Shakhovka. The operation met disaster. Traffic accidents delayed reinforcements, and the battalion was mauled by a ferocious enemy force comprising Wagner mercenaries, Chechen fighters, Serbian volunteers, and Russian Spetsnaz. Equipped with BMP-2 infantry fighting vehicles, the separatists inflicted severe casualties, forcing a withdrawal. Shakhovka was subsequently reinforced with an enemy anti-aircraft battery.

Redemption at Staroye

On June 6, the battered 19th Cavalry returned to the sector (Operation OP2506-06-1). Tragedy struck immediately: the Task Force Command Squad was annihilated by enemy BMPs upon reaching Staroye. Command fell to a junior officer – the 2nd Squad Commander.

Displaying exceptional resolve, the acting commander organized Staroye’s defense, repelling repeated assaults by Wagner, Spetsnaz, and Russian militia. After stabilizing the position, the surviving troops assaulted Shakhovka, destroying the enemy anti-aircraft battery and clearing the village. During the fight, the acting commander personally eliminated a female enemy operative and seized her cell phone containing a detailed log of ammunition deliveries across the front – a major intelligence coup.

Key Findings and Fallout

• Foreign Footprint: Both reports confirm extensive deployment of Wagner Group mercenaries, Chechen "Kadyrovtsy," Serbian volunteers, and Russian Spetsnaz alongside separatist irregulars.

• Civilian Atrocities Planned: The captured "elimination list" from Shakhovka provides concrete evidence of systematic enemy plans to murder civilians.

• Strategic Shift: Military analysts assess the heavy losses inflicted on elite separatist/mercenary units will likely push their main effort westward in the coming weeks.

• Coastal Lifeline: The successful defense of The Factory complex ensured the NS-7 Coastal Highway – Chernarus’s vital coastal supply artery – remains under government control.

High Cost of Victory

While both Shakhovka and Staroye are now under Chernarus control, the victories came at a steep price. The 19th Cavalry Regiment suffered devastating losses, particularly among command elements. The 4th Mountain Brigade also sustained heavy infantry casualties defending The Factory. Military command has ordered urgent reinforcements and replacements for both units.

Colonel Aleksandr Bogomolov, Deputy Chief of Staff of the 1st Army Corps, authored both after-action reports. His recommendations include immediate commendations for the acting commander of the 19th Cavalry’s Shakhovka assault and the 3rd Squad of the Mountain Brigade, alongside urgent reviews of convoy security, force protection, and intelligence-sharing protocols.

The courage displayed by junior leaders rising to the occasion, particularly in the crucible of Staroye, underscores the resilience of Chernarus forces. Yet the scale of foreign involvement and the evidence of planned war crimes highlight the grim reality facing the nation as fighting continues to rage.

// END //

Editorial Note: Zelenogorsk Pravda relies on verified military sources and battlefield reporting. Specific tactical details, unit strengths, and exact casualty figures remain classified for operational security. The dates of operations reflect when they concluded.

This is based on the Arma 3 wargame. The report and reporter are AI generated and represents no individual, living or dead. The text of the transcript, while AI generated, is based on data provided by the channel author.

AFTER ACTION REPORT: OPERATIONS OP2505-30-7 & OP2506-06-1 (SHAKHOVKA-STAROYE SECTOR)

 AFTER ACTION REPORT: OPERATIONS OP2505-30-7 & OP2506-06-1 (SHAKHOVKA-STAROYE SECTOR)

AUTHOR: Colonel Aleksandr Bogomolov, Deputy Chief of Staff, 1st Army Corps

DATE: 8 June 2025

UNIT: 1st Battalion, 19th Separate Mechanized Cavalry Regiment (Chernarus Armed Forces)

REPORTING PERIOD: 30 May 2025 - 6 June 2025

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION: SECRET

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Operations OP2505-30-7 (attack) and OP2506-06-1 (counterattack/clearance) in the Shakhovka-Staroye sector resulted in a costly tactical victory for friendly forces following an initial significant defeat. Separatist forces, including high-quality Wagner Group, Chechen, Serbian, and Russian Spetsnaz elements, inflicted heavy casualties and initially repelled our assault. Subsequent adjustments and determined action by surviving elements of 1/19 SMR secured both objectives and captured vital intelligence, but at high cost. Separatist strategic focus is assessed to be shifting westwards following these engagements. Concurrent defense of the coastal factory sector denied separatist access to the coast and the vital NS-7 Coastal Highway.

2. SITUATION:

Enemy Forces: Composed of a mixed contingent: Wagner Group PMC operators, elements of Chechen "Kadyrovtsy" formations, Serbian Volunteer Corps regulars, Russian Spetsnaz (SOF), Russian Militia (LDNR-style), and separatist irregulars. Demonstrated significant aggression, tactical proficiency (especially Wagner/Spetsnaz), and ability to rapidly reinforce. Employed BMP-2 IFVs effectively. Deployed an anti-aircraft battery (type unspecified) to Shakhovka following OP2505-30-7.

Friendly Forces: 1st Battalion, 19th Separate Mechanized Cavalry Regiment (1/19 SMR). Task-organized combined arms elements (mechanized infantry, armor support, HQ elements).

3. EXECUTION:

Operation OP2505-30-7 (30 May 2025): Attack on Staroye & Shakhovka**

*   **Concept:** Simultaneous advance to secure Staroye followed by clearance of Shakhovka.

*   **Execution:**

    *   Significant delays occurred due to traffic accidents involving critical assets (logistics, potentially armor/engineering) en route.

    *   Delays in infantry reinforcement arrival crippled offensive tempo.

    *   Task Force established defensive positions NW and NE of Staroye under heavy, sustained attack from Wagner, Chechen, Serbian, and Russian Spetsnaz elements. Enemy forces inflicted heavy casualties on friendly troops.

    *   Despite repelling initial determined assaults, the Task Force, weakened by casualties and lacking timely reinforcements, was unable to generate sufficient combat power to proceed with the attack on Shakhovka.

    *   Ordered withdrawal from the sector completed under pressure.

*   **Outcome:** **TACTICAL DEFEAT.** Failure to secure Shakhovka. Significant friendly casualties. Separatist forces reinforced both Staroye and Shakhovka, including deploying one Anti-Aircraft Artillery (AAA) battery to Shakhovka.

Operation OP2506-06-1 (6 June 2025): Defense of Staroye & Attack on Shakhovka**

*   **Concept:** Counterattack to retake Staroye, neutralize the AAA threat in Shakhovka, clear Shakhovka, and establish a defensible position in Staroye.

*   **Execution:**

    *   Regimental Operations Staff successfully addressed reinforcement composition and flow; critical assets reached Staroye without significant incident.

    *   **Initial Contact Catastrophe:** Upon arrival at Staroye, Task Force Command Squad was effectively destroyed in an immediate, violent engagement with two (2) enemy BMP-2s. Command decapitated.

    *   **Assumption of Command:** 2nd Squad Commander assumed duties as Acting Task Force Commander.

    *   **Defense of Staroye:** Acting Commander organized defenses within Staroye. Repelled multiple fierce counterattacks involving Wagner, Russian Spetsnaz, and Russian Militia elements. Suffered further heavy casualties but held the objective.

    *   **Attack on Shakhovka:** Upon cessation of major counterattacks, Acting Commander prioritized neutralizing the AAA battery identified as the primary objective. Command Squad (former 2nd Squad) and 3rd Squad successfully located and destroyed the AAA battery.

    *   **Clearance of Shakhovka:** Proceeding into Shakhovka, friendly forces systematically cleared the village against determined resistance.

    *   **Significant Intelligence Capture:** Acting Commander personally located and eliminated a female enemy operative. Recovered her cell phone and a detailed list documenting dates, times, and locations of ammunition deliveries across the Chernarus front. One entry concerning her Shakhovka operation was circled.

    *   **Withdrawal & Consolidation:** Following Shakhovka's clearance, Acting Commander ordered a deliberate withdrawal back to Staroye to consolidate forces and establish a robust defense against anticipated further counterattacks.

*   **Outcome:** **TACTICAL VICTORY.** Staroye secured. Shakhovka cleared, primary AAA threat eliminated. Vital enemy intelligence captured. However, victory achieved at high cost in personnel and equipment, stemming largely from the initial Command Squad loss.

4. ASSESSMENT:

OP2505-30-7 Failure Factors: Critical traffic accidents and reinforcement delays were primary contributors to mission failure. These logistical/planning failures prevented the concentration of necessary combat power at the decisive point (Shakhovka). The quality and aggression of enemy forces were underestimated; their ability to rapidly commit Wagner, Chechen, Serbian, and Spetsnaz elements overwhelmed our initially successful defense. This defeat represents a rare and significant setback for Chernarus mechanized cavalry.

OP2506-06-1 Success Factors: Remediation of reinforcement flow by Regimental Staff was crucial. The decisive leadership, initiative, and tactical acumen displayed by the Acting Task Force Commander (former 2nd Squad Commander) under extreme duress were instrumental in salvaging the situation and achieving objectives. The prioritization and destruction of the AAA battery demonstrated sound tactical judgment. The capture of the ammunition delivery schedule is of high strategic intelligence value.

Command Squad Loss (OP2506-06-1): The near-instantaneous destruction of the Command Squad by enemy BMPs upon reaching Staroye was catastrophic. The Acting Commander attributed this solely to "Bad luck. They got the drop on us. That's all there is to it." While tactical surprise is a factor, this incident warrants a separate, deeper investigation into force protection measures, reconnaissance push, and HQ element vulnerability during movement to contact/occupation.

Overall Cost: Operations in the Shakhovka-Staroye sector were ultimately successful in denying the enemy these key nodes and eliminating a significant AAA threat. However, success came at a very high cost in personnel for both sides. Friendly forces demonstrated resilience but suffered heavily.

Enemy Reaction & Strategic Shift: The level of damage inflicted on separatist forces (loss of high-quality personnel, AAA battery, key operative, sensitive intelligence) is assessed as significant. It is highly probable this will compel separatist command to shift the focus of their main effort further west in the near term.

Broader Strategic Context (Factory Defense): It is critical to note that concurrent defensive operations preventing separatist forces from reaching the coast, specifically aimed at severing the NS-7 Coastal Highway and capturing Berezino, were successful solely due to the determined resistance of our forces. Denying the enemy this prime strategic objective remains paramount.

5. RECOMMENDATIONS:

Investigate OP2505-30-7 Delays: Conduct a formal inquiry into the traffic accidents and reinforcement delays. Implement corrective measures for convoy management, route reconnaissance, and reinforcement scheduling/pipeline assurance.

Commend Acting Leadership: Recommend the Acting Task Force Commander (2nd Squad Commander) for immediate formal recognition and promotion consideration for exceptional leadership under fire.

Review Force Protection & Recon: Initiate a Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTP) review focused on reducing HQ element vulnerability during movement to contact and occupation of objectives. Emphasize aggressive reconnaissance screening.

Exploit Captured Intelligence: Expedite the processing and analysis of the captured cell phone and ammunition delivery schedule by Corps/Strategic Intelligence. Utilize this data for targeted interdiction operations and force protection adjustments across the front.

Reinforce & Refit 1/19 SMR: Prioritize personnel replacements and equipment resupply for 1/19 SMR due to heavy casualties sustained in both operations. Consider temporary operational pause for reconstitution.

Increase Vigilance Western Sector: Alert all commands in the western operational area to the high probability of increased separatist activity and potential offensive operations, based on the assessed strategic shift.

Sustain Coastal Defense Focus: Reinforce the critical strategic importance of denying the enemy the NS-7 Coastal Highway and Berezino. Ensure defensive plans and resources for the coastal sector, particularly the factory complex, remain robust and receive priority support.

6. CONCLUSION: Operations OP2505-30-7 and OP2506-06-1 underscore the volatile and costly nature of combat against a determined, well-equipped separatist force employing high-quality mercenary and foreign troops. While initial failure resulted from logistical shortcomings and underestimation of enemy capabilities, subsequent adaptation, improved support, and exceptional junior leadership secured the objectives and valuable intelligence at significant cost. The Corps must learn from the failures of OP2505-30-7, recognize the valor displayed in OP2506-06-1, prepare for enemy retaliation in the west, and remain unwavering in the defense of the coastal corridor. The captured intelligence offers a significant opportunity to degrade enemy logistics.

// SIGNED //

Colonel Aleksandr Bogomolov

Deputy Chief of Staff

1st Army Corps, Chernarus Armed Forces

This is based on the Arma 3 wargame. The report and reporter are AI generated and represents no individual, living or dead. The text of the transcript, while AI generated, is based on data provided by the channel author.

AFTER ACTION REPORT (AAR) Operations: OP2505-30-5 & OP2506-30-6

 HEADQUARTERS, 1ST ARMY CORPS

AFTER ACTION REPORT (AAR)
Operations: OP2505-30-5 & OP2506-30-6
Unit: 1st Battalion, Chernarus 4th Separate Light Mountain Rifle Brigade
Date: 8 June 2025
Author: Colonel Aleksandr Bogomolov, Deputy Chief of Staff, 1st Army Corps
Classification: SECRET

I. SITUATION

A. Enemy Forces:
Separatist elements, reinforced by a detachment of highly trained Wagner Group mercenaries, occupied Shakhovka village. Intelligence indicated a pattern of using mercenaries for targeted civilian deportations. Enemy preparations included pre-registered defensive artillery fires. Subsequent to OP2505-30-5, a large, well-led mixed infantry-mechanized group (assessed as newly recruited/assembled forces) advanced south toward "The Factory" enclave.

B. Friendly Forces:
1st Battalion, 4th Separate Light Mountain Rifle Brigade (Task Force), organized into Command Squad and Rifle Squads 2–4. Follow-on operations involved 1st Battalion, 19th Separate Mechanized Cavalry Regiment.

C. Civilian Considerations:
Shakhovka’s population faced imminent threat of deportation/elimination. "The Factory" enclave was sparsely populated but strategically contested.

II. MISSION

OP2505-30-5: Retake Shakhovka from separatist/mercenary forces, neutralize high-value targets (HVTs), and secure actionable intelligence.
OP2506-30-6: Defend "The Factory" against a major separatist counterattack.

III. EXECUTION

OP2505-30-5: SHASHOVKA CLEARANCE (D+0)

A. Concept of Operations:
A two-pronged assault bypassing enemy artillery impact zones:

• Main Effort: Command Squad & 4th Squad attacked SW through dense forest.

• Supporting Effort: 2nd & 3rd Squads maneuvered SE.

B. Key Actions:

1. Approach: Squads successfully navigated around artillery kill zones with minimal attrition.

2. Engagement:

   • Command/4th Squads eliminated separatist levies and Wagner operators SW of the village.

   • 2nd/3rd Squads suppressed flanking positions.

3. HVT Elimination:

   • 3rd Squad tasked with locating/neutralizing four Wagner mercenaries – mission accomplished.

   • Task Force Commander personally engaged and eliminated two civilian criminal command operatives and their security detail.

4. Exploitation:

   • Village secured by 1120 hrs.

   • Critical documents seized:

     • Civilian "elimination list" (32 names).

     • Separatist remote server access data (IPs, credentials, operational servers).

OP2506-30-6: DEFENSE OF THE FACTORY (D+1)

A. Intelligence Alert:
Early D+1 warning of large mechanized-infantry force advancing south toward "The Factory" via HUMINT and signals intercepts.

B. Defensive Actions:

1. Battalion established hasty defensive perimeter.

2. Repelled coordinated, high-intensity assaults by estimated company(+) element.

3. Outcome: Enemy attack repulsed with significant hostile casualties.

4. Friendly Losses: Heavy infantry casualties sustained.

C. Follow-On Order:
Despite losses, 1st Battalion, 19th Mechanized Cavalry Regiment ordered to conduct clearing ops in Shakhovka periphery.

IV. INTELLIGENCE GAINS

1. Documentation: Civilian target lists confirm systematic terror campaign. Server data enables cyber counter-operations.

2. Enemy Composition: Wagner involvement validates external backing of separatists. "Fresh" troops at The Factory indicate accelerated recruitment/training pipelines.

3. Tactics: Separatist reliance on pre-sighted artillery and mercenary-led purge operations confirmed.

V. ASSESSMENT

A. Successes:

• OP2505-30-5: Swift, precise execution. HVTs eliminated, critical intel captured with zero civilian casualties.

• OP2506-30-6: Successful defense against superior force preserved key terrain.

• Intelligence: Server data represents significant strategic windfall.

B. Shortfalls:

• Delayed exploitation of intel warning for The Factory defense.

• High friendly losses necessitate accelerated reinforcement/reconstitution.

C. Enemy Performance:

• Wagner elements: Professionally competent but neutralized by superior maneuver.

• Separatist recruits: Aggressive but undisciplined under sustained fire.

VI. RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Immediate:

   • Exploit captured server data for counter-intelligence ops.

   • Prioritize protection of civilians on seized elimination lists.

2. Tactical:

   • Enhance artillery counter-preparation drills for light infantry.

   • Review early-warning protocols between intel and maneuver elements.

3. Personnel:

   • Accelerate replacement flow to 4th Light Mountain Brigade.

   • Decorate 3rd Squad (1/4th LMRB) for exceptional performance in HVT elimination.

// SIGNED //
COLONEL ALEKSANDR BOGOMOLOV
Deputy Chief of Staff, 1st Army Corps
END REPORT

Distribution:
Commander, 1st Army Corps | G-2, 1st Army Corps | G-3, 1st Army Corps | Commander, 4th Sep. Lt. Mtn. Rifle Bde. | Commander, 19th Mech. Cav. Reg.

This is based on the Arma 3 wargame. The report and reporter are AI generated and represents no individual, living or dead. The text of the transcript, while AI generated, is based on data provided by the channel author.