Sunday, March 8, 2026

'They pointed rifles and shouted': CDF storms Chernogorsk hospital in daring daylight raid

 ZELENOGORSK PRAVDA

"Truth in Service of the Nation"

Separatists Ousted from General Hospital as Patients, Staff Recount Terrifying Ordeal

Chernogorsk — The General Hospital in the heart of Chernogorsk is once again under government control after a daring daylight assault by regular Chernarus Defense Forces troops on Saturday, military officials have confirmed.

The operation, described by one participating officer as "textbook," unfolded after intelligence reports revealed that Russian-backed militia forces had seized the facility, forcibly ejecting patients, doctors, and nurses before using the building as a stronghold.

What followed was a harrowing ordeal for the civilians caught in the crossfire—and a precision military response that left the separatists with little choice but to surrender.


'WE WERE CERTAIN WE WOULD BE EXECUTED'

The invasion of the hospital began without warning.

"They burst into our offices, pointing rifles at us and shouting for us to leave," recalled one doctor, still visibly shaken hours after the ordeal. "We left quickly and immediately."

For the medical staff, the initial moments were a blur of confusion and terror.

"I have never been so scared in my life," another doctor told Zelenogorsk Pravda from a temporary shelter set up for displaced medical workers. "For a moment I was certain that we were going to be executed by the separatists. You know what they do elsewhere."

A nurse described the chaos as it unfolded around her.

"It was so sudden! At first, a lot of shouting and we could not figure out what was going on until they burst into clinics and offices, shouting for us to leave. My first thought was they were going to kill us all—until I was able to leave the hospital."

Among those forced out were mothers with young children.

"Me and my kids were there to get a vaccination," a young female patient recounted, her voice still trembling. "My kids were crying very loud. When they burst into the clinic, I raised my hands, and the young separatist with a rifle motioned for me and my kids to leave. I was relieved when we were able to exit the building."


'CELL PHONES WENT DARK'

Once the separatists had cleared the ground floor of civilians, they began fortifying the building.

An office worker who had been visiting a colleague described the scene as heavily armed militants moved through the hallways.

"We stood at the wall with all these rifles pointed at us, with all these young men shouting, as several men passed by carrying heavy weapons heading upstairs. Once those hallways were cleared, they ordered us out."

Communications were cut almost immediately.

"Our cell phones went dark," a hospital staff worker said. "We couldn't call anyone. We didn't know if anyone knew what was happening to us."

On the upper floors, the terror was even more acute.

One nurse who had been working on the top floor when the separatists stormed the building spent the entire occupation hiding in a utility closet.

"When our troops began firing on the hospital, it was the loudest thing I'd ever heard. I was so scared," she said. "I spent 20 minutes hiding inside a utility closet when it all began. All these young men were running around the halls shouting at others to get out. I was afraid to leave and get shot for hiding. But when the CDF started shooting, I decided I best stay put."


'THEY DIDN'T TOUCH THE PHARMACY'

One detail that puzzled medical staff was the separatists' complete disregard for the hospital's narcotics supply.

"I was certain that they were there to rob the pharmacy," a doctor admitted. "You know, we have a lot of narcotics in the pharmacy. But they didn't touch that. They didn't touch anything."

The observation suggests the hospital was seized for its strategic value—a fortified position in the heart of Chernogorsk—rather than for material gain.


THE ASSAULT: 'TEXTBOOK' EXECUTION

As civilians streamed out of the hospital, CDF forces were already moving into position.

A military officer who spoke on background described the operation in clinical terms.

"The assault we conducted was textbook. Once our heavy armor destroyed strong points and heavy vehicles the separatists had deployed, our infantry approached the building from two separate directions and entered through two separate entrances."

The separatists, faced with a coordinated, professional assault, offered little resistance.

"Many separatists and their commanders threw down their rifles and surrendered immediately. We moved them back to base for interrogation."

What amazed the officer most was not the success of the operation, but its cost.

"What amazed us was how light friendly casualties were."


AFTERMATH

In the hours following the operation, the hospital was declared secure. Displaced medical staff began returning to assess the damage and prepare for the resumption of normal operations.

For the patients and staff who lived through the ordeal, the psychological scars may take longer to heal.

The young mother who had brought her children for vaccinations summed up the experience of many:

"I was just happy to get out alive."


WHAT COMES NEXT

Military officials have not disclosed how many separatists were captured during the operation, nor have they released details of the interrogation process. It is also unclear whether the hospital will require significant repairs before it can fully reopen.

But for the people of Chernogorsk, Saturday's operation sent a clear message: the CDF can and will strike decisively to protect civilian lives and infrastructure, even in the heart of contested urban terrain.

The hospital is free. The patients are safe. And the separatists who sought to turn a place of healing into a fortress have been removed.


Contact Svetlana Golikova at s.golikova@zelenogorsk-pravda.chernarus


Editor's Note: Some details have been withheld at the request of military authorities to protect operational security and the privacy of individuals involved.

Sunday, March 1, 2026

'They screamed and we came': Inside the rescue of Kabanino

 Zelenogorsk Pravda

"Truth in Service of the Nation"

Senior Defense Correspondent Svetlana Golikova Reports on the Winter Campaign's Final, Decisive Battle

Zelenogorsk — In the frozen pre-dawn darkness of February 28, four women huddled in a basement in Kabanino. Two of them were local agents who had risked everything to report on separatist movements. Two were innocents, swept up in the same net. For days, they had heard the screams of their fellow prisoners echo through the village. One of the women—young, unnamed in official reports—had been tortured so severely that when soldiers finally reached her, the signs of what she endured were unmistakable.

Four days later, two of those women are alive. Two are not.

And a village that controls the major east-west highway of Chernarus is back in government hands.

Zelenogorsk Pravda has obtained the classified after-action report for Operation KABANINO (OP2602-27-2), the final major engagement of the winter campaign. It is a document of brutal efficiency and moral clarity—a story of how a devastating defeat at Rogovo was transformed, through patience, precision, and courage, into a victory that may shape the spring.


THE DEFEAT THAT PRECEDED THE VICTORY

To understand Kabanino, one must first understand Rogovo.

On February 24, four days before the counterattack, 2nd Battalion of the Chernarus 4th Separate Light Mountain Rifle Brigade engaged separatist forces in a meeting engagement at the village of Rogovo. The intent was straightforward: stop enemy encroachment before spring.

Instead, the separatists threw "every available vehicle they had" at government forces. The attack was massive, overwhelming, and ultimately forced a retreat.

The damage was severe. According to the after-action report, it would take 2nd Battalion "a minimum of a week to prepare for a counterattack."

Brigade Commander Colonel Alexey Lushnikov faced a choice: launch an immediate, angry response to avenge the defeat, or wait, consolidate, and strike properly.

He chose to wait.

"He scotched the idea of an immediate counterattack," the report states flatly. Instead, Lushnikov appealed to Corps Commander Major General Yuri Stytskovsky for reinforcements—specifically, 1st Battalion of the Chernarus 19th Separate Mechanized Cavalry Regiment. The request was approved.

The delay bought time for something equally critical: intelligence preparation.


THE INTELLIGENCE PICTURE

What emerged from agent reports, electronic intercepts, and drone overflights was a complete picture of the enemy's dispositions.

Kabanino, it turned out, was not merely occupied. It was reinforced. Following the Rogovo success, separatist commanders had poured armor, infantry, and artillery into the village, recognizing its strategic value astride the east-west highway that connects both halves of Chernarus.

But the most chilling intelligence came from local friendly agents. Four civilians had been taken prisoner—two of them agents, two innocent. And then came the reports that changed the nature of the mission.

"Local residents heard screaming from one of the prisoners," the report notes. Agents suspected torture.

The rescue of those prisoners was never designated the highest priority by battalion command staff. But it became, in the words of one officer who was there, "a task that had to be completed."


THE PLAN

The operation that unfolded in the early hours of February 28 was a model of combined arms coordination.

The task force assembled south of Kabanino included eight T-55 tanks with desant infantry elements, plus four additional T-55s for troop transport and reinforcement. A 122mm rocket artillery battery was placed under the command of Corps Counterbattery Commander Colonel Evgeny Biyatov. Four drones were made available for target acquisition and battle damage assessment.

The plan was methodical:

  • Southeast Axis: 2nd and 3rd Squads, dismounted, would penetrate the enemy defensive cordon with four tanks in support.

  • Southwest Axis: 4th Squad would advance on the church, with transport vehicles maneuvering west to overwatch the main road.

  • Northern Axis: Command Squad would conduct penetration operations to locate and eliminate the civilian criminal command operatives.

  • Western Overwatch: Two T-55s would position to observe both the highway and the open terrain to the northwest.

But before any of that could happen, the enemy's artillery had to die.


THE COUNTERBATTLE

In the darkness, drones located enemy artillery positions. The 122mm rocket battery went to work. By the time the ground assault began, separatist guns had been neutralized.

"The counterbattery fire enabled ground maneuver," the report states. It is a clinical description of what was, in reality, the difference between life and death for the infantry who would soon move into the village.


THE ASSAULT

What followed was a coordinated penetration from multiple axes.

On the southeast approach, 2nd and 3rd Squads sliced through the enemy cordon, tanks providing direct fire support. On the southwest, 4th Squad pushed toward the church. Transport vehicles maneuvered west, establishing overwatch positions that would prove decisive in the hours to come.

Command Squad, moving north, encountered resistance. The firefight was brief but intense—sufficient, however, for them to reach their objective. Two civilian criminal command operatives were located and eliminated.

And then they found the basement.


THE PRISONERS

The details in the after-action report are spare, clinical, devastating.

"Task Force Commander located the civilians being held prisoner," it reads. "Two female prisoners were advised they were being evacuated south to Scout 1 (BRDM) for return to base. Two of the civilian prisoners had been killed. One young female showed signs of having been severely tortured."

The other prisoners eventually found their way to the rendezvous point. They were evacuated.

The screams the agents had heard—the screams that had filtered through the village and reached friendly lines—had been real. Two women did not survive. One did, bearing the physical evidence of what had been done to her.

"She was barely conscious when we found her," one soldier involved in the rescue later told this reporter, his voice carefully controlled. "But she was alive. She is alive."


THE TANK GUNFIGHT

Even as the prisoners were being evacuated, the battle was not over.

The two T-55s on western overwatch had been watching the highway. When enemy vehicles attempted to respond to the assault, the tanks engaged.

What followed was described in the report as a "tank-versus-tank gunfight" lasting approximately ten minutes. When it was over, one T-55 from 4th Squad and one from Command Squad had been destroyed. But at least four enemy tanks were confirmed destroyed by friendly armor, with additional vehicles damaged or destroyed.

"The enemy ceased counterattack attempts," the report notes. "Clear loss of will to contest Kabanino."


THE ACCOUNTING

The final casualty assessment is remarkable for its asymmetry.

Friendly losses: Two T-55 tanks destroyed. Infantry losses described as "light."

Enemy losses: At minimum, four tanks destroyed, plus additional armored vehicles damaged or destroyed. Infantry casualties described as "severe." Artillery assets neutralized during the counterbattery phase. Total losses described by participating units as "catastrophic"—sufficient, in the judgment of intelligence staff, to cause "considerable delay" in future separatist operations.

Civilian casualties: Two killed, one tortured but rescued, two rescued unharmed.


'THE MORAL IMPERATIVE OF OUR MISSION'

In his formal comments appended to the after-action report, Corps Commander Major General Yuri Stytskovsky wrote words that are likely to be quoted in command schools for years to come:

"The Kabanino counterattack demonstrates that with proper preparation, combined arms coordination, and intelligence integration, our forces can defeat separatist formations decisively while preserving combat power. Colonel Lushnikov's judgment in delaying the counterattack—despite political pressure—reflects mature command understanding and should be recognized.

"The rescue of tortured civilians reminds us of the nature of our enemy and the moral imperative of our mission.

"The winter campaign concludes with Kabanino as its final, successful operation. We enter spring with momentum."


WHAT COMES NEXT

The report includes a series of recommendations, some immediate, some for the longer term:

  • Maintain pressure on retreating enemy forces with reconnaissance elements.

  • Establish a permanent checkpoint on the east-west highway to prevent re-infiltration.

  • Formalize drone-artillery coordination procedures at brigade level.

  • Expand counterbattery capabilities.

  • Document enemy atrocities for war crimes prosecution.

And perhaps most importantly: "Preserve momentum through spring with reconstituted armored forces."

The question now is whether that momentum can be sustained. The separatists have been dealt a catastrophic blow at Kabanino. But they have been dealt blows before, and they have returned.

For the women who survived the basement in Kabanino—for the two who did not—the victory is already complete. They are free, or they are dead, and both are preferable to what they endured.

For the rest of Chernarus, the battle for Kabanino is a sign of what is possible when patience, intelligence, and courage are combined.

The winter campaign is over. Spring is coming.

And the highway is ours.


Contact Svetlana Golikova at s.golikova@zelenogorsk-pravda.chernarus


Editor's Note: Some operational details have been withheld or altered at the request of Chernarus Coastal Operations Group. The names of certain personnel and rescued civilians have been omitted to protect operational security and individual privacy.

1st Army Corps After Action Report: OP2602-27-2 (Counterattack on Kabanino)

 RESTRICTED//OPERATIONAL SECURITY

1st Army Corps After Action Report: OP2602-27-2 (Counterattack on Kabanino)

TO:
Major General Yuri Stytskovsky, Commander, Chernarus 1st Army Corps
Major General Vassily Chernyakov, ChCOG Senior Staff Intelligence Analyst
Admiral Vadim Ivanov, Commander, Chernarus Coastal Operations Group

FROM:
Colonel Alexey Agopyan, Deputy Head of Intelligence Staff, 1st Army Corps

DATE: 1 March 2026

CLASSIFICATION: RESTRICTED//OPERATIONAL SECURITY


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

On 28 February 2026, 2nd Battalion, Chernarus 4th Separate Light Mountain Rifle Brigade, reinforced by 1st Battalion, Chernarus 19th Separate Mechanized Cavalry Regiment, conducted Operation KABANINO (OP2602-27-2), a deliberate counterattack against separatist forces occupying the strategic village of Kabanino. The operation was conceived as a response to the failed meeting engagement at Rogovo (OP2602-20-5) on 24 February, which had resulted in a costly retreat.

The Kabanino counterattack achieved all operational objectives: the village was secured, enemy forces were routed with catastrophic losses, and four civilian prisoners—including two local agents—were recovered. Critically, the operation severs enemy lines of communication along the major east-west highway, denying separatists the ability to consolidate gains across Chernarus.

Friendly losses were light. Enemy losses, while not precisely counted, were described by participating units as "catastrophic" and sufficient to cause "considerable delay" in future separatist operations.


1. SITUATION AND INTELLIGENCE

1.1 Strategic Context

The operation responded to the failed meeting engagement at Rogovo (OP2602-20-5) on 24 February, in which separatist forces committed every available vehicle to a massive attack that forced government forces to retreat. Damage to 2nd Battalion, 4th Separate Light Mountain Rifle Brigade was severe, requiring a minimum of one week to prepare for counterattack.

1.2 Enemy Situation at Kabanino

  • Strategic Value: Kabanino sits atop a major east-west highway, controlling lines of communication across both eastern and western Chernarus

  • Garrison: Reinforced following Rogovo success; composition included armor, infantry, and artillery assets

  • Atrocities: Four civilians taken prisoner—two local friendly agents, two innocent civilians. Local agents reported hearing screams from prisoners, indicating torture

1.3 Intelligence Sources

  • HUMINT: Local friendly agents confirmed reinforcement and provided prisoner location data

  • Electronic Intercepts: Email and text message traffic supplemented agent reports

  • Drone Overflights: Confirmed enemy dispositions and artillery positions

  • Prisoner Exploitation: Post-operation debriefing of rescued civilians provided additional intelligence


2. FRIENDLY FORCES

2.1 Task Force Composition

UnitElementEquipmentRole
2nd Bn, 4th Light Mountain Rifle Bde2nd SquadDismounted infantrySoutheast penetration
2nd Bn, 4th Light Mountain Rifle Bde3rd SquadDismounted infantrySoutheast penetration
2nd Bn, 4th Light Mountain Rifle Bde4th SquadDismounted infantrySouthwest assault (church objective)
2nd Bn, 4th Light Mountain Rifle BdeCommand SquadDismounted infantryNorthern penetration / CP capture
1st Bn, 19th Mechanized Cavalry RegtTank Section8x T-55 tanksMain assault force
1st Bn, 19th Mechanized Cavalry RegtReinforcing Tanks4x T-55 tanksTroop transport / reinforcement
1st Army Corps ArtilleryRocket Battery122mm multiple rocket launchersCounterbattery / fire support
Corps ReconnaissanceDrone Section4x UAVsTarget acquisition / BDA

2.2 Key Command Personnel

  • Brigade Commander, 4th Separate Light Mountain Rifle Brigade: Colonel Alexey Lushnikov

  • Task Force Commander: (Not specified in source)

  • 1st Army Corps Artillery Commander: Colonel Pavel Gerasimov

  • 1st Army Corps Counterbattery Commander: Colonel Evgeny Biyatov


3. OPERATION CHRONOLOGY

3.1 Preparatory Phase (24-27 February)

Following the Rogovo defeat, Colonel Lushnikov requested reinforcement from 1st Battalion, 19th Separate Mechanized Cavalry Regiment, rather than launching an immediate counterattack. Corps Commander Major General Stytskovsky approved, granting time for intelligence preparation and operational planning.

Artillery and counterbattery staffs began coordinated preparations for defeating enemy artillery, utilizing drone reconnaissance for target acquisition.

3.2 Deployment (28 February, Approx. 0400-0600 hrs)

  • Main Force: Eight T-55 tanks with four desant elements massed south of the rise south of Kabanino

  • Reinforcing Tanks: Four T-55 tanks (Tanks 7, 8 plus two others) prepared to transport four small rifle squads as reinforcements

  • Artillery: 122mm rocket battery positioned under Colonel Biyatov's command

  • Drones: Four UAVs deployed for artillery spotting and BDA

3.3 Counterbattle Phase (Approx. 0600-0700 hrs)

Drone reconnaissance located enemy artillery positions. Counterbattery fire from 122mm rocket battery neutralized enemy artillery, enabling ground maneuver.

3.4 Ground Assault (Approx. 0700-0900 hrs)

Southeast Axis:

  • 2nd and 3rd Squads dismounted and began penetration operations against enemy defensive cordon

  • Four tanks provided direct fire support

Southwest Axis:

  • 4th Squad dismounted early and advanced toward church objective

  • Transport vehicles (Tanks 7 and 8) maneuvered west to overwatch position on main east-west road

Northern Axis:

  • Command Squad dismounted and conducted penetration operation north

  • Primary objective: Locate and eliminate civilian criminal command operatives

Western Overwatch:

  • Two T-55 tanks positioned to observe main east-west road and open terrain to northwest

3.5 Key Objectives Secured (Approx. 0900-1000 hrs)

  • Command Operatives: After brief but intense firefight, Command Squad advanced to known location of two civilian criminal command operatives; both eliminated

  • Civilian Prisoners: Task Force Commander located prisoners; two female civilians evacuated south to Scout 1 (BRDM) for return to base

  • Casualties Among Prisoners: Two civilians killed; one young female showed signs of severe torture

3.6 Tank Engagement (Approx. 1000-1010 hrs)

Two T-55 tanks on western overwatch engaged multiple enemy vehicles, devolving into a tank-versus-tank gunfight lasting approximately 10 minutes:

  • Friendly Losses: One T-55 from 4th Squad destroyed; one T-55 from Command Squad destroyed

  • Enemy Losses: At least four tanks destroyed by friendly armor

  • Outcome: Enemy forces ceased counterattack attempts; clear loss of will to contest Kabanino


4. CASUALTY ASSESSMENT

4.1 Friendly Losses

UnitEquipment LostPersonnel Losses
4th Squad1x T-55 tankLight (unspecified)
Command Squad1x T-55 tankLight (unspecified)
Infantry SquadsNoneLight
TOTAL2x T-55 tanksLight

4.2 Enemy Losses

Field Count Limitations: Reliable aggregate count not available due to operational tempo and focus on prisoner evacuation. Participating unit reports consistently describe enemy losses as "catastrophic," including:

  • Minimum 4 tanks destroyed (confirmed)

  • Additional armored vehicles damaged/destroyed (unconfirmed)

  • Infantry casualties severe

  • Artillery assets neutralized during counterbattery phase

Operational Impact: Losses sufficient to cause "considerable delay" in future separatist operations.

4.3 Civilian Casualties

  • Killed: Two civilians (executed by separatists prior to liberation)

  • Tortured: One young female (survived, evacuated)

  • Rescued: Two female civilians evacuated to base


5. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS

5.1 Operational Outcome

  • Primary Objective Achieved: Kabanino secured; east-west highway denied to enemy

  • Secondary Objectives Achieved: Command operatives eliminated; prisoners rescued

  • Strategic Impact: Last operation of winter campaign concluded successfully

5.2 Critical Success Factors

  1. Deliberate Preparation: Colonel Lushnikov's refusal to rush counterattack allowed proper intelligence preparation and force concentration

  2. Corps Reinforcement: 1st Battalion, 19th Mechanized Cavalry Regiment provided critical mass

  3. Artillery-Counterbattery Coordination: Gerasimov and Biyatov effectively neutralized enemy artillery prior to ground assault

  4. Drone Integration: Four UAVs enabled precise target acquisition and BDA

  5. Tactical Flexibility: Western overwatch tanks successfully transitioned to anti-armor role

5.3 Key Lessons

  • Counterattack operations require adequate preparation time regardless of political pressure

  • Prisoner rescue missions can be integrated successfully with primary combat objectives

  • Tank-versus-tank engagements remain decisive in open terrain

  • Civilian atrocities by separatists confirm enemy disregard for Geneva Conventions

  • Light infantry-armor coordination effective when properly supported


6. RECOMMENDATIONS

6.1 Immediate Actions

  • Exploit Success: Maintain pressure on retreating enemy forces with reconnaissance elements

  • Secure Prisoners: Ensure rescued civilians receive medical care and psychological support; debrief for additional intelligence

  • Battle Damage Assessment: Commit additional drone assets to confirm full extent of enemy losses

  • Highway Security: Establish permanent checkpoint on east-west highway to prevent enemy re-infiltration

6.2 Future Operations

  • Follow-On Exploitation: Consider limited objective attacks against retreating enemy columns

  • Spring Campaign Planning: Use Kabanino as staging base for operations against remaining enemy strongholds

  • Intelligence Exploitation: Analyze documents recovered from civilian criminal command operatives

6.3 Long-Term Recommendations

  1. Formalize drone-artillery coordination procedures at brigade level

  2. Expand counterbattery capabilities with additional rocket artillery assets

  3. Develop rapid reinforcement protocols for light infantry brigades

  4. Document enemy atrocities for war crimes prosecution

  5. Preserve momentum through spring with reconstituted armored forces


7. COMMANDER'S COMMENTS

The Kabanino counterattack demonstrates that with proper preparation, combined arms coordination, and intelligence integration, our forces can defeat separatist formations decisively while preserving combat power. Colonel Lushnikov's judgment in delaying the counterattack—despite political pressure—reflects mature command understanding and should be recognized.

The rescue of tortured civilians reminds us of the nature of our enemy and the moral imperative of our mission.

The winter campaign concludes with Kabanino as its final, successful operation. We enter spring with momentum.

— Maj. Gen. Yuri Stytskovsky
Commander, Chernarus 1st Army Corps


8. DISTRIBUTION

  • Commander, 1st Army Corps (Maj. Gen. Stytskovsky)

  • ChCOG Senior Staff Intelligence (Maj. Gen. Chernyakov)

  • Commander, ChCOG (Adm. Ivanov)

  • Commander, 4th Separate Light Mountain Rifle Brigade (Col. Lushnikov)

  • Commander, 19th Separate Mechanized Cavalry Regiment

  • 1st Army Corps Artillery Command (Col. Gerasimov)

  • 1st Army Corps Counterbattery Command (Col. Biyatov)

  • 1st Army Corps Operations Staff

  • 1st Army Corps Intelligence Staff


Colonel Alexey Agopyan
Deputy Head of Intelligence Staff
1st Army Corps
Chernarus Defense Forces

CLASSIFICATION: RESTRICTED//OPERATIONAL SECURITY