Monday, October 20, 2025

CLASSIFIED REPORT DETAILS CATASTROPHIC MILITARY FAILURE NEAR TROITSKOYE

by  Svetlana Golikova 

Senior staff writer for Chernogorsk Pravda

CHERNOGORSK – A recently obtained and heavily redacted after-action report from the 19th Separate Mechanized Cavalry Regiment reveals a devastating military operation on 15 OCT that resulted in the near-total destruction of a government task force, the failure of its primary objectives, and the deaths of dozens of soldiers.

The document, authored by Captain Esedulla Abachev, the Deputy Head of Intelligence for the regiment, and provided to this publication by a confidential source within the Ministry of Defence, paints a stark picture of the engagement, attributing the failure to "effective enemy action" and a "critical intelligence failure."

The operation, involving a Task Force from the regiment's 3rd Battalion, was launched with the objective of attacking and clearing enemy-occupied positions, starting at the Landfill sector and proceeding to the village of Troitskoye to re-establish government control.

According to the report, the day-long battle was a series of brutal engagements that systematically dismantled the Task Force.

Disaster on the Heights

The initial assault on the Landfill in the morning hours began with success, as friendly armor destroyed enemy tanks and armored personnel carriers. However, the operation quickly turned. A key maneuver element, "2nd Squad," was positioned on high ground to block enemy reinforcements. There, they were assaulted by an estimated three squads of enemy special forces. The report states the grim outcome in blunt military terminology: "the annihilation of 2nd Squad." All twelve soldiers were killed in action.

This devastating loss forced the Task Force Commander to commit his reserves prematurely and order a "tactical withdrawal" from the Landfill to proceed to the main objective: the village of Troitskoye.

"Catastrophic Loss" in Troitskoye

The situation deteriorated further in the afternoon during the assault on Troitskoye. The report identifies a "critical intelligence failure" as the core reason for the subsequent disaster. The Task Force Commander's plan relied on intelligence that placed an enemy T-72 tank on the western edge of the village.

Acting on this flawed information, "3rd Squad," mounted on two older T-55 tanks, was ordered to advance on the western approach. The intelligence was tragically wrong. The enemy tank was, in fact, positioned on the eastern edge of the village, giving it a clear line of fire.

The result was a slaughter. The enemy T-72 engaged and "destroyed both friendly T-55s and eliminated 3rd Squad within two (2) minutes." Another twelve soldiers were lost in a matter of moments.

With his force crippled, the Task Force Commander personally led the remnants of his Assault Squad in a desperate clearing operation of the village. Just as the sweep was completed, a lone enemy armored vehicle emerged, destroying two regimental gunships providing close air support and inflicting over 50% casualties on the Assault Squad.

With the unit's combat effectiveness "critically degraded," the order for a full withdrawal was given.

A Regiment Broken

The final tally is harrowing. The operation cost the lives of at least 24 soldiers from 2nd and 3rd Squads, with the Assault Squad suffering over 50% casualties. The material losses included two T-55 tanks and two gunships. Captain Abachev's conclusion is unequivocal: "The unit is no longer combat effective and requires reconstitution."

The report's analysis leaves little room for interpretation. The failure is attributed to the "devastating counter-attack by enemy special forces" and the "critical intelligence failure regarding enemy armor disposition." Among its key recommendations is a pointed question about the army's own equipment, urging a review of "the viability of committing T-55 platforms against modernized MBTs."

Attempts to secure an official comment from the Ministry of Defence or the press office of the Chernogorsk Combined Operational Command (ChCOG) were met with no response. The silence from official channels stands in stark contrast to the detailed account of valor and failure contained within the leaked pages. This report raises serious questions about the quality of military intelligence, the equipment provided to our frontline soldiers, and the true human cost of the ongoing conflict in the region.

This is based on the Arma 3 wargame. The report and reporter are AI generated and represents no individual, living or dead. The text of the transcript, while AI generated, is based on data provided by the channel author.

After Action Report, Task Force 3rd Battalion Combat Operations, 15 OCT

 FROM: Deputy Head of Intelligence Staff, 19th Separate Mech Cav Regt

TO: Regimental Commander, 19th Separate Mech Cav Regt
COPY TO: Deputy Commander ChCOG; Commander Intelligence ChCOG; ChCOG Senior Staff Intelligence Analyst
REF: AAR-19MECH-28OCT
SUBJECT: AFTER ACTION REPORT - Task Force 3rd Battalion Combat Operations, 15 OCT

1. SITUATION
a. Enemy Forces: Separatist elements of significant strength, including local levy infantry, special forces teams (estimated 3 squads), and mixed armor (T-72 MBT, BTR-80A APC). Demonstrated capability for coordinated counter-attacks and armor ambushes.
b. Friendly Forces: Task Force from 3rd Battalion, 19th Separate Mechanized Cavalry Regiment. Composition: Command/Assault Squad, 2nd Squad (12x effectives), 3rd Squad (12x effectives), Armor Element (2x T-72, 2x T-55).

2. MISSION
Attack and clear enemy-occupied locales, commencing at the Landfill and proceeding to the village of Troitskoye, to re-establish government control.

3. EXECUTION
a. Phase 1: Assault on Landfill (Morning, 15 OCT)

  • (1) Command/Assault Squad, supported by 2x T-72, initiated primary assault, penetrating enemy infantry cordon.

  • (2) Armor Element (T-72s) engaged and destroyed 1x enemy T-72 and 1x enemy BTR-80A.

  • (3) 2nd Squad, mounted on 2x T-55, maneuvered to occupy and secure high ground Northeast of the objective to block enemy reinforcement.

  • (4) Upon clearing the initial objective, Command/Assault Squad established a blocking position between the main road and 2nd Squad's position, engaging and destroying medium enemy armor moving along the road.

  • (5) Enemy special forces (3x squads) conducted a concentrated assault on the heights, resulting in the annihilation of 2nd Squad.

  • (6) Task Force Commander committed operational reserves to stabilize the flank and prevent enemy exploitation.

  • (7) Task Force conducted a tactical withdrawal from the Landfill to proceed to secondary objective.

b. Phase 2: Assault on Troitskoye (Afternoon, 15 OCT)

  • (1) Task Force Commander's plan relied on prior intelligence indicating an enemy T-72 was positioned on the western edge of the village.

  • (2) 3rd Squad, mounted on 2x T-55, was ordered to advance and dismount on the western approach.

  • (3) Command/Assault Squad began its penetration of the village's defensive perimeter.

  • (4) Enemy T-72, positioned on the eastern extent of the village, engaged and destroyed both friendly T-55s and eliminated 3rd Squad within two (2) minutes.

  • (5) Friendly Armor Element (Tank 2) subsequently engaged and destroyed the enemy T-72.

  • (6) With no reinforcements available, the Task Force Commander personally led the remaining Assault Squad in a west-to-east clearing operation of the village.

  • (7) Upon completion of the sweep, a lone enemy BTR-80A engaged, inflicting 50% casualties on the Assault Squad and destroying both regimental gunships providing CAS.

  • (8) With combat effectiveness critically degraded, the Task Force Commander ordered a full withdrawal to base.

4. SERVICE SUPPORT
Logistics and recovery operations performed adequately. No issues reported.

5. COMMAND AND SIGNAL
Command and control was maintained throughout the operation. Loss of key assets (gunships) severely degraded situational awareness and fire support capability during final phase.

6. CASUALTIES & EQUIPMENT LOSSES

  • PERSONNEL: 2nd Squad (12x KIA), 3rd Squad (12x KIA), Assault Squad (>50% casualties).

  • EQUIPMENT: 2x T-55 Destroyed, 2x Gunships Destroyed.

7. ANALYSIS & RECOMMENDATIONS
a. Analysis:

  • The operation failed to secure two of its three primary objectives.

  • Failure was attributable to two primary factors:

    • (1) Effective and devastating counter-attack by enemy special forces at the Landfill, which eliminated a key maneuver element and forced the premature commitment of reserves.

    • (2) Critical intelligence failure regarding enemy armor disposition at Troitskoye. The misidentification of the enemy T-72's position led to the catastrophic loss of 3rd Squad and its armor support, crippling the Task Force's combat power for the main objective.

b. Recommendations:

  • (1) Review and enhance battlefield reconnaissance and intelligence verification procedures to prevent repeat of armor disposition errors.

  • (2) Develop and drill contingency plans for rapid response to enemy special forces infiltration and counter-attack on flanking positions.

  • (3) Assess the viability of committing T-55 platforms against modernized MBTs without significant stand-off or top-attack capability.

8. CONCLUSION
Task Force 3rd Battalion displayed courage and maintained offensive momentum despite initial setbacks. However, due to effective enemy action and a critical intelligence oversight, the operation culminated at Troitskoye without achieving its primary goals. The unit is no longer combat effective and requires reconstitution.

CAPTAIN ESEDULLA ABACHEV
DEPUTY HEAD OF INTELLIGENCE STAFF
19TH SEPARATE MECHANIZED CAVALRY REGIMENT

This is based on the Arma 3 wargame. The report and reporter are AI generated and represents no individual, living or dead. The text of the transcript, while AI generated, is based on data provided by the channel author.

Monday, October 13, 2025

43rd Mountain Rifle Corps Intelligence Staff North Zagoria Region Operational Summary

TOP SECRET//NOFORN
43rd Mountain Rifle Corps Intelligence Staff
North Zagoria Region Operational Summary
12 October 2025

TO:

  • Major General Sergey Gladkov, Corps Commander

  • Colonel Nikolai Pisarev, Deputy Corps Commander

FROM:
Colonel Sergei Glukharev
Deputy Head of Intelligence Staff, 43rd Mountain Rifle Corps

REF: OP2510-10-1 After Action Analysis & Enemy Capability Assessment


1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Separatist forces in North Zagoria have transitioned from guerrilla tactics to conventional warfare preparations, evidenced by recent armored reinforcements and established supply chains. Operation IVANOVKA successfully disrupted enemy forward positioning but revealed concerning strategic developments, including planned winter offensives with foreign reinforcement and mass irregular recruitment.


2. OPERATION IVANOVKA (OP2510-10-1) TACTICAL ASSESSMENT

2.1 Enemy Dispositions & Capabilities

  • Forces Identified: T-62 (1), T-55 (1) main battle tanks, plus logistical support elements

  • Tactical Posture: Defensive preparations indicated intent to establish forward supply base

  • Terrain Utilization: Village of Ivanovka employed as defensive strongpoint with limited western approach cover

2.2 Friendly Force Execution

  • Task Force Commander: Senior Lieutenant Belobadorov

  • Scheme of Maneuver:

    • Primary assault along western creek axis using urban cover

    • Eastern tank position established for overwatch and counter-armor operations

  • Modification to Plan: Squad roles reversed during advance with successful document capture

2.3 Combat Effectiveness

  • Armor Engagements: Friendly forces neutralized enemy T-72, T-62, T-55, and T-34 counterattacks with minimal losses

  • Intelligence Capture: One civilian criminal command operative eliminated, securing critical planning documents


3. CRITICAL INTELLIGENCE FINDINGS

3.1 Enemy Winter Campaign Planning

Captured documents outline sophisticated offensive operations scheduled winter 2025-2026:

  • Armor Reinforcements: Significant increases in medium/heavy tracked armor promised

  • Foreign Combat Elements: Iranian regulars identified as imminent reinforcement

  • Escalated Violence: Planned intensification of pogroms beyond summer 2025 levels

3.2 Force Generation & Recruitment

  • Irregular Mobilization: Plans to recruit ~150 local irregulars for light infantry attacks

  • Resource Stockpiling: Northern supply depots accumulating fuel, ammunition, cash, and non-combatant personnel (including women)

3.3 Enemy Logistics & Communications

  • Communications Security: Marked improvement in electronic security measures

  • Supply Chain Development: Established resupply networks evident in forward positions


4. SOURCE EVALUATION

4.1 Human Intelligence (HUMINT)

  • Local Agents: Remain primary intelligence source; reliability assessed HIGH

  • Enemy Territory Agents: Most valuable intelligence gained through extraordinary measures (kidnappings/interrogations); reliability assessed HIGH

  • Prisoner Interrogations: Corroborated document findings; reliability assessed MEDIUM-HIGH

4.2 Technical Intelligence (TECHINT)

  • Drone Surveillance: Effective for force disposition mapping; limited against improved enemy COMSEC

  • Document Exploitation: Critical for strategic forecasting; reliability assessed HIGH


5. ENEMY CAPABILITY PROJECTION

5.1 Immediate (0-30 Days)

  • Continued probing attacks with armored elements

  • Expansion of supply depots in northern sectors

  • Recruitment campaigns for irregular forces

5.2 Medium-Term (1-3 Months)

  • Winter offensive initiation with foreign reinforcement

  • Massed irregular attacks to overwhelm defensive positions

  • Increased armored company-level operations

5.3 Strategic Implications

Enemy transitioning to conventional force capability requiring corps-level combined arms response. Iranian regular integration suggests external state sponsorship escalation.


6. RECOMMENDATIONS

  1. Preemptive Operations: Authorize immediate disruption campaigns against northern supply depots

  2. Force Enhancement: Prioritize anti-armor capabilities and electronic warfare assets to battalion level

  3. Counter-Intelligence: Increase monitoring of local population for irregular recruitment activities

  4. Strategic Preparation: Prepare winter warfare contingency plans accounting for 150+ irregular combatants

  5. External Action: Request Foreign Intelligence Directorate (SVR) analysis of Iranian regular deployment channels


APPENDICES

  • A: Document Translation Excerpts

  • B: Prisoner Interrogation Summaries

  • C: Ivanovka Terrain Analysis

DISTRIBUTION: Corps Command Staff, Operations Directorate, 1st/2nd Rifle Division Commanders


Colonel S. Glukharev
Deputy Head of Intelligence Staff
43rd Mountain Rifle Corps
Zelenogorsk, Chernarus

This is based on the Arma 3 wargame. The report and reporter are AI generated and represents no individual, living or dead. The text of the transcript, while AI generated, is based on data provided by the channel author.